More wiki work

September 27, 2007 at 7:20 pm (1)

I got to thinking about some of the precursors of our modern conception of social networking, such as chat rooms, message boards, and groups.  During the 90s, when these things were growing in popularity, I didn’t have much experience with them.  I think I might have gone into a chat room once, to talk about theatre.  It wasn’t a terribly interesting experience, so I never bothered to return.  I’m sure there are more positive tales from that era of Internet interaction.  What i was thinking about was how these early tools had evolved, or if they had evolved.  I could probably break up social networking tools into categories like “Passive” and “Active,” and cross reference it with “Synchronous” and “A-Synchronous” and maybe other axes as well.  For example, a chat room is Active Synchronous, meaning that you and others are present, interacting in relative realtime.  Message boards are Active A-Synchronous, meaning that you and others are present and posting, but not necessarily all at the same time.  A similar distinction could be drawn between IM and email.  Passive things might be harder to define, but I think of things like the Facebook accessories, where once you’ve set them up, things can happen with or without you – there’s a lot of automation as part of the process.  I’m not sure if that’s the best way to describe it, or if it’s significantly different from other Active methods.  I guess modern social networking sites often cover all four potential methods of communication, across the spectrum of Active/Passive and Synch/A-Synch, whereas older methods exploited only one point on that spectrum.

So, do people still go into Chat rooms?  Yes, I’m sure they do.  Why?  I’m not sure i know that.  Most of my social networking occurs between me and friends and family (people with whom I have and existing relationship offline), or with library professionals of like interest, usually the interest of figuring out how all these zany new tools work.  I suppose that that would be the component that would equate to some of the more anonymous forms of chat/social networking that occur online, but my interactions with these other library professionals are pretty passive – i check out what they’re doing and talking about, but only actively engage them with comments and such on a rare basis.

I started a mini-section for this issue on the wiki, in case any libraries wanted to explore these pre-cursors, but i feel like my suggestions are a little arbitrary as yet.  It’s at the bottom of the first page of the Library 2.0 in 15 Minutes a Day.

This is what i have so far, over yonder at the wiki (so you don’t have to click over and scan down):

Groups – like Google GroupsYahoo Groups, and now  Group Swim.

Seems like the whole “Groups” idea was a precursor to current social networking practices.  Interesting to see how/if it’s evolved.  Of course, if we’re exploring precursors to current social networking phenomenon, then we’d have to look at chat rooms as well – not a bad idea, since chat rooms are one of those things that quickly gets filtered.  Maybe if we understand them, we can make more informed decisions about their use in libraries and schools…

Learning about Chat:

We could always start with Wikipedia’s definition of Chat Room, but it looks a little on the thin side, so we should also check out some other sources (I’ll find some soon…)

Chat places:

Yahoo Chat, of course.

Here’s one that has a high Google rank – I didn’t go into any of the chat rooms, but take a look at the categories available.   Chat Avenue  says they have a Kids Chat section, but it’s stuck in the middle of a lot of other chat room possibilities that are probably not as kid-oriented…

People Connection at AOL looks like another chatty type area.

Of course, chat rooms have their counterpart in IM, with group chat functions.  Group chat can be pretty useful in organizations, the online equivalent of a conference call.  If people are spread over a diverse area, then group chat can be a good way to handle discussions, particularly if they involve the sharing of web resources – you can post links, and people can look at them while keeping up with the chat.


Permalink Leave a Comment

Status report?

September 17, 2007 at 3:29 pm (Uncategorized)

It’s been a little while since i blogged.  Here are some things I think about that:

Some things that i do with this blog:  Keep track of new sites and tools that i find that might be of interest to me, my co-workers, or librarians in general.  Keep track of what’s going on with the Library 2.0 wiki.  Keep track of all the profiles i’ve made at other 2.0 sites.

Some things I don’t do:  Provide opinions about trends in library science.  Dispute/support claims made by others regarding web 2.0, internet evolution, technological development, etc.

I do read a lot of other blogs in the biblioblogosphere (enough that i know what that word means…) and the ones that i enjoy most out there tend toward the thought-provoking and opinionated ones.  There are a couple of blogs that i read that review sites and tools from a librarian perspective, and they do a good job – lots of the tools that i end up working with or reviewing here come from those blogs.

So then I have to ask, should i continue blogging?  Why did i start blogging in the first place?

A:  I started blogging to see what blogging was all about.  My first blog ever was at MySpace.  It was clunky, and often erased an entry before i had time to post it.  Very annoying.  So i moved to Blogger, and basically reviewed books, movies, music, and other media.  People weren’t banging down my door to read it, but then again, i didn’t expect them to.  It was good exercise for writing.  After i had had that blog for a while, I started a couple more blogger blogs for very limited purposes, then in January or Feb. of this year, I started this blog, as a back-up for the wiki, just to keep track of all the stuff that was going on with it.  I was also in charge of my library’s work blog.

So then what happened?

Well, I got all these 2.0 profiles out there in the world, and began to see how some of them worked well together, and others worked well for what i liked to do on the Internet.  For book reviews i had goodreads, and it connects to Facebook, which is a much better social hub than MySpace ever was.  Those are the two big ones for me, personally.  That’s kind of left my Blogger blog out in the cold.  As far as this blog goes, I’ll keep using it for what i’ve been using it for – notes on what’s going on with the things that I’m working on, so that i can come back later and remember what i was doing, or talking about, or looking at.

Ah, it’s good to sum things up from time to time, so that next week i can get all gung-ho about something and completely destroy my carefully re-established self-image.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Animoto rocks

September 11, 2007 at 8:17 pm (Uncategorized)

Ellyssa over at iLibrarian suggested Animoto as a fun mashup site, and i have to agree!  I made a short video to promote library computer classes.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Hey lookit that!

September 5, 2007 at 6:22 pm (Uncategorized)

Looks like Quechup is getting a lot of heat for their Spam-tactics.  Sorry I mentioned it.  Think I’ll go cancel my persona there.  Okay, I did that.  Let’s see if they send me follow-up emails…

Permalink Leave a Comment

New Social network site

September 5, 2007 at 6:16 pm (Uncategorized)

Got invited to join Quechup, which appears to be very much “singles” oriented.  You fill in information about yourself, and Quechup helps you meet people with common interests, or something like that.  Don’t know how i feel about it yet.  At this point, I’m not really looking for more of the same in social networking sites, or even for sites that are hoping to have the best features of other social networks all in one place.  Since I’m not someone who depends on social networking software for my social life, it can be difficult sometimes to really ‘get into’ some of these sites.  I’m mostly interested in the technology and the innovations, and trends, and things like that, as clues to what new twists and turns the future might take at any moment.

So, here’s my profile on Quechup:

More later.

Permalink Leave a Comment